Converting URLs Into Links With Regex

4.5 (14 votes)

Following on from the recent spate of extensions methods I've posted, here's another I use to convert URLs and email addresses into links within HTML. You may want to restrict users from submitting HTML tags via forms in your application, which means that URLs and email addresses that they submit appear as plain text unless they are subjected to some kind of processing.


/// <summary>
/// Finds web and email addresses in a string and surrounds then with the appropriate HTML anchor tags 
/// </summary>
/// <param name="s"></param>
/// <returns>String</returns>
public static string WithActiveLinks(this string s)
{
  //Finds URLs with no protocol
  var urlregex = new Regex(@"\b\({0,1}(?<url>(www|ftp)\.[^ ,""\s<)]*)\b", 
    RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Compiled);
  //Finds URLs with a protocol
  var httpurlregex = new Regex(@"\b\({0,1}(?<url>[^>](http://www\.|http://|https://|ftp://)[^,""\s<)]*)\b", 
    RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Compiled);
  //Finds email addresses
  var emailregex = new Regex(@"\b(?<mail>[a-zA-Z_0-9.-]+\@[a-zA-Z_0-9.-]+\.\w+)\b", 
    RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Compiled);
  s = urlregex.Replace(s, " <a href=\"http://${url}\" target=\"_blank\">${url}</a>");
  s = httpurlregex.Replace(s, " <a href=\"${url}\" target=\"_blank\">${url}</a>");
  s = emailregex.Replace(s, "<a href=\"mailto:${mail}\">${mail}</a>");
  return s;
}

This will convert most URLs, but not all. Parsing URLs is not the easiest thing to do so you need to make a judgement on what type of URLs your users/visitors are most likely to provide and alter the regex patterns accordingly. One thing to point out is that the second pattern (the one that matches URLs with a protocol - http, https etc) also checks to make sure that it isn't already a hyperlink. By the time the second Replace() operations takes place, URLs without protocols will already be fitted with them, and have HTML surrounding them.

 

You might also like...

Date Posted:
Last Updated:
Posted by:
Total Views to date: 14533

1 Comment

- Tvrtko

Hello Mike,
this works great, however, part with email link will duplicate anchor tag. For http urls you did ignore existing html anchors from match correctly , but for email they get matched even if they have html anchor around already.

Recent Comments

Sivu 19/10/2016 08:21
In response to Entity Framework Core TrackGraph For Disconnected Data
Oh that's very very very nice ! Thanks for the write up Mike, much appreciated for the taking the to...

Mark 12/10/2016 16:42
In response to ASP.NET Web Pages vNext or Razor Pages
Although "Web Pages" was removed from the roadmap, has it just been renamed to "Razor Pages"?...

Satyabrata 12/10/2016 09:20
In response to Entity Framework Core TrackGraph For Disconnected Data
Nice article. Please write more articles featuring ASP.Net web pages. Thank you...

Julian 26/09/2016 14:27
In response to Loading ASP.NET Core MVC Views From A Database Or Other Location
Fantastic, many thanks Mike! Had got half way down this road before finding your article - saved...

Abolfazl Roshanzamir 14/09/2016 05:36
In response to Loading ASP.NET Core MVC Views From A Database Or Other Location
Nice article. Thanke you so much ....

cyrus 02/09/2016 15:12
In response to ASP.NET Web Pages vNext or Razor Pages
I've got some news. As Damian stated in this link: https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/5208 “We...

Simon 01/09/2016 08:00
In response to Loading ASP.NET Core MVC Views From A Database Or Other Location
Thanks Mike, nice post and exactly what I was looking for. Like you said, I think I'll opt to the...

dave 20/08/2016 14:57
In response to ASP.NET Web Pages vNext or Razor Pages
Do SimplemembershipProvider in viewpages is supported?...

Steven 18/08/2016 04:40
In response to Entity Framework Code First and Stored Procedures
Can you provide the directives (using statements) you're using for EF7 example?...

yousaid 17/08/2016 22:08
In response to ASP.NET Web Pages vNext or Razor Pages
Increasingly, learning a Microsoft tool is no longer worth the return on investment. Too many tools...